10FastFingers Alternative: FastTypings vs 10FastFingers (2026)

Last updated October 16, 2026 · by the FastTypings team

10FastFingers has been a go-to one-minute typing test for well over a decade, with tests in more than 50 languages, custom text tests, and long-running competitions you can share with a group.

FastTypings covers the same one-minute test and adds things to type against: bots at 40, 70, and 100 WPM, live multiplayer races, a voice race mode, and a daily challenge with streaks, in 22 fully localised languages and with a mobile-first input. Here is how the two compare, including where 10FastFingers is still the better pick.

FastTypings vs 10FastFingers: Feature Comparison

Details for 10FastFingers (10fastfingers.com) reflect our understanding as of October 2026 and may have changed since. Spotted something wrong? Tell us via the about page and we'll fix it.

Why Choose FastTypings over 10FastFingers?

• FastTypings lets you race a bot opponent at three set paces (40, 70, and 100 WPM). 10FastFingers tests and competitions are scored against the clock and other people's results, with no live opponent on screen.
• FastTypings has a unique voice race mode that lets you race by speaking rather than typing — a feature not available on 10FastFingers.
• FastTypings is optimised for mobile with a native soft-keyboard experience — 10FastFingers works in a mobile browser but is not purpose-built for touchscreen typing.

When 10FastFingers Is the Better Choice

No comparison is honest if one side wins every row. 10FastFingers has real strengths, and for some typists it is the better fit:

• Your language is not among FastTypings' 22. 10FastFingers offers its 1-minute test in more than 50 languages — the broadest language coverage of any major typing site.
• You want the historic benchmark. The 10FastFingers top-200-words test has been a community standard since the late 2000s, and its long-running leaderboards give you years of scores to measure against.
• You drill custom text. 10FastFingers lets you paste any text and publish it as a shareable custom typing test — handy for vocabulary lists, code snippets, or domain-specific practice material.
• You like slow-burn competitions. Anyone can create a 10FastFingers competition link that stays open for days, so a forum thread or a classroom can compete asynchronously on the same text.

Switching from 10FastFingers to FastTypings

If your routine is the 10FastFingers 1-minute test, FastTypings' 1-minute test is a drop-in replacement: a stream of common English words, sixty seconds on the clock, net WPM at the end. You also gain 15, 30, and 120-second variants plus 25, 50, and 100-word tests when you want a different session length. Mobile is the biggest quality-of-life change — the full test works with your phone's soft keyboard, so a commute can become practice time.

The advanced test's harder vocabulary maps to FastTypings' difficulty toggles: switch on punctuation and numbers, or run the 100-word test, to push past the everyday top-200 stream. 10FastFingers competitions map to two things here — the challenge link (every result screen can copy a link daring a friend to beat your score) and live multiplayer races when you would rather compete in real time than over days.

What you keep: completely free, no signup. What you gain: bot opponents at 40, 70, or 100 WPM, voice race, daily streaks, and a native mobile experience. What you genuinely lose: paste-your-own-text tests and the 50+ language catalogue — if either is central to your practice, keep 10FastFingers in rotation.

Why Your WPM Differs Between FastTypings and 10FastFingers

These two sites should agree more closely than most. Both run a common-word stream without punctuation for one minute and derive WPM from correct keystrokes at five characters per word, so a 60 WPM typist on one will normally land within a handful of WPM on the other. Word-order randomness accounts for most of the remaining difference, along with a methodological nuance: 10FastFingers judges whole words when you confirm them with the spacebar, while FastTypings tracks every character as you type it. Both show enough detail to sanity-check a result — keystrokes and wrong words there, raw-versus-net WPM and per-key accuracy here — so an outlier score is easy to explain.

Cross-language comparison is the real trap. WPM depends on average word length, and the five-characters-per-word convention means languages with longer words — German, Finnish, Turkish — produce lower WPM at identical skill. If you test in several of 10FastFingers' 50+ languages, compare each score only against the same language, on either site.

Full details of how FastTypings scores a test are on how we calculate WPM.

Frequently Asked Questions